<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cheap Phone News &#187; phone companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/category/phone-companies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com</link>
	<description>News about Phones and Cheap Phone Calls Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phones and Recycled Phone Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/cell-phones-and-recycled-phone-numbers.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/cell-phones-and-recycled-phone-numbers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Teller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phone companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever someone set up new phone service, whether wireline or wireless, there as always the possibility of being given a recycled number. On the old PSTN, phone companies usually held disconnected numbers for about 3 months before putting them back &#8230; <a href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/cell-phones-and-recycled-phone-numbers.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever someone set up new phone service, whether wireline or wireless, there as always the possibility of being given a recycled number. On the old PSTN, phone companies usually held disconnected numbers for about 3 months before putting them back into service. This meant that a new customer that was allocated that number would receive periodic calls intended for the former owner. This is much more of a problem<br />
<span id="more-833"></span><br />
when cell phones are concerned because a call would be more likely to be intrusive and/or could be chargeable to the recipient. However, these days, the bigger problem is that the former user of the number may have signed up with various services to receive SMS messages and/or MMS messages, both of which are typically chargeable to the recipients, and being automated, are much more difficult to stop. So when comparing between various options, don&#8217;t just look at the phone features and the plan features offered by the wireless operator. Fijnd out how likely you are to receive a recycled number, what their policy is to change numbers and what features they may have to block incoming SMS and MMS messages. However, if you intend to actively exchange SMS and MMS messages, then simply having blocking capabilities is not enough. Getting a virgin phone number is what&#8217;s necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/cell-phones-and-recycled-phone-numbers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excess bandwidth fees &#8211; Bell Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/excess-bandwidth-fees-bell-canada.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/excess-bandwidth-fees-bell-canada.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Teller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phone companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed that Bell Canada has recently lowered its bandwidth caps on some of its high speed internet plans. I&#8217;m not sure when this happened but do recall that the higher end plans, which now have bandwidth caps of 30 &#8230; <a href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/excess-bandwidth-fees-bell-canada.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that Bell Canada has recently lowered its bandwidth caps on some of its high speed internet plans. I&#8217;m not sure when this happened but do recall that the higher end plans, which now have bandwidth caps of 30 GB per month, were up at around 100 GB last time I looked (perhaps a year ago?). Bell does state that the cap &#8220;applies to new clients without a term agreement; $1.00/additional GB,<br />
<span id="more-834"></span><br />
rounded up to the next GB of up to $30/month&#8221;. So they may have grandfathered existing customers, or at least the ones that had signed up for a term plan. See this chart to compare the various plans offered. While this seems like a high limit, it would not be hard to reach it for households who use IPTV services or who have kids running bit torrent. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/excess-bandwidth-fees-bell-canada.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FuturePhone.com offers free long distance</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/futurephonecom-offers-free-long-distance.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/futurephonecom-offers-free-long-distance.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phone companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Futurephone.com is offering free long distance to a couple of dozen international destinations for people who already have free US long distance or a bucket of minutes they can utilize for US long distance. No VOIP adapters or softphones required. &#8230; <a href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/futurephonecom-offers-free-long-distance.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Futurephone.com is offering free long distance to a couple of dozen international destinations for people who already have free US long distance or a bucket of minutes they can utilize for US long distance. No VOIP adapters or softphones required. Instead, callers make a phone call to an IOWA phone number and are then provided with a dial-tone to dial internationally. Right now the company appears to be trying to<br />
<span id="more-835"></span><br />
build up its user base. Next year we may see them introduce commercial messages that are played before a call is put through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/futurephonecom-offers-free-long-distance.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CRTC affirms its VOIP ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/crtc-affirms-its-voip-ruling.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/crtc-affirms-its-voip-ruling.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Teller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phone companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada&#8217;s telecommunications regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), reaffirmed an earlier decision to continue to regulate what the major telephone companies can charge for VOIP services &#8211; at least until the incumbent telephone companies lose 25% of their &#8230; <a href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/crtc-affirms-its-voip-ruling.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada&#8217;s telecommunications regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), reaffirmed an earlier decision to continue to regulate what the major telephone companies can charge for VOIP services &#8211; at least until the incumbent telephone companies lose 25% of their market share. In doing so, it ignored the government&#8217;s desire to allow free market forces to play a bigger role. From the Globe and Mail.</p>
<p><span id="more-836"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/crtc-affirms-its-voip-ruling.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless Data Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/wireless-data-comparison.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/wireless-data-comparison.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Teller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phone companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I last surveyed Canadian options for high speed wireless data: - Rogers has raised the cap on its top EDGE plan (C$100) from 100 MB to 200 MB- Bell and Telus have imposed caps (250 MB) on their EVDO &#8230; <a href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/wireless-data-comparison.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I last surveyed Canadian options for high speed wireless data:</p>
<p>- Rogers has raised the cap on its top EDGE plan (C$100) from 100 MB to 200 MB<br />- Bell and Telus have imposed caps (250 MB) on their EVDO 1x plans (C$100) which can be expected to provide better performance than currently available EDGE technology</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the US cellular carriers continue to offer uncapped high speed data plans at lower rates than their Canadian counterparts:</p>
<p><span id="more-837"></span></p>
<p>- T-mobile EDGE (US$49.99)<br />- Cingular EDGE (US$60 with voice plan, $80 without)<br />- Verizon EVDO 1x (US$60 with voice plan)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/wireless-data-comparison.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unlimited doesnâ€™t always mean unlimited</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/unlimited-doesn’t-always-mean-unlimited.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/unlimited-doesn’t-always-mean-unlimited.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jana Williamson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phone companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As TechDirt again reminds us all, just because a carrier says their service is UNLIMITED in large letters doesn&#8217;t mean it isn&#8217;t subject to bandwidth and usage caps that can result in the service being cut off for unsuspecting users. &#8230; <a href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/unlimited-doesn’t-always-mean-unlimited.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As TechDirt again reminds us all, just because a carrier says their service is UNLIMITED in large letters doesn&#8217;t mean it isn&#8217;t subject to bandwidth and usage caps that can result in the service being cut off for unsuspecting users. Wireless Broadband services are not really a substitute for DSL.</p>
<div align="right">Information from source: <a href="http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/07/27/unlimited-doesnt-always-mean-unlimited/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/07/27/unlimited-doesnt-always-mean-unlimited/</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/unlimited-doesn’t-always-mean-unlimited.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>P2P TV Coming Soon?</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/p2p-tv-coming-soon.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/p2p-tv-coming-soon.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Phone News</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phone companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Business 2.0 Blog, the people who brought us Napster and Skype now want to bring us a peer-to-peer television service. While there are already a number of TV over-the-internet services already available, a P2P based service would &#8230; <a href="http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/p2p-tv-coming-soon.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Business 2.0 Blog, the people who brought us Napster and Skype now want to bring us a peer-to-peer television service. While there are already a number of TV over-the-internet services already available, a P2P based service would save on the huge bandwidth costs.</p>
<div align="right">Information from source: <a href="http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/07/27/p2p-tv-coming-soon/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/07/27/p2p-tv-coming-soon/</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheap-phone-news.com/p2p-tv-coming-soon.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

